ty | 5/1/2012 1:46:13 AMsome one can find luv in nywhere whether big or small....she is a woman 2 couple 4 d fact dat she is big,let dem enjoy life 2 d fullest..... Reply this thread

Pwetieberie | 5/1/2012 2:24:21 AMNawa o,is dis luv,eniola shld pls let dis guy go....and davido 2 shld luk 4 sum1 else Reply this thread

Big | 5/1/2012 2:42:47 AMUna go fear fear.... Mama and pikin running show and some call it love or watever. common this is totaly awkward. Well let them enjoy it while it last cos this just another story to be 4gotn soon. Reply this thread

Sampson Victoria | 5/1/2012 5:17:05 AMThis is child abuse on Davido.....Eniola pls go and get your size and leave the little boy alone. r*****h In Human Form Reply this thread

Taiwo Idowu NY | 5/1/2012 6:40:26 AMIf you want it,go for it.Dont let anyone tell you how you feel.Afterall,this guy is old enough to make his own decision because he is over 18yrs old.I dont know how old you are,but you dont look that old.Listen,life is too short,ride the wave why the sea is calm and enjoy it while it last.No matter what you do,people will say.What if it was the other way around?.Will there be all the fuss?.One more time,enjoy youeself and to hell with haters. Reply this thread

small | 5/1/2012 9:00:09 AMdboy might be SMALL in nature, but may be strong on Bed.
only the lady can tell Y... Reply this thread

LOLLYTER | 5/1/2012 9:18:40 AMNA LIE DNT LET DIS B REAL OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Reply this thread

nneka | 5/1/2012 9:44:09 AMEniola is climbin her way tru controvasy.if has a date wit an older person it wldnt make head line.bt dis is gvin her popularity cos it looks weird to us.n dis is wrkin for her.eniola u no d game girl big up ur chest ur a smart Reply this thread

Ede boy | 5/2/2012 2:09:28 AMAbeg o stop dey cary all dis rumour. Dy ar just platonic frnds. Savvy? No kil davido 4 us for Ede o cos we ar proud of him. Greatest Edelite! Reply this thread

mimi | 5/2/2012 12:17:21 PMher lip stik is evn on his lips mawa oh isnt she old enuf 2 b dat boys mum? Reply this thread

Jerry dee | 5/3/2012 5:41:12 AMMy boy,neva mind them...keep on enjoyin...omo baba olowo. Reply this thread

Omo mama olowo | 5/6/2012 11:40:32 AMYoung erikina no kil urself,palè stil nid u,no let busty, busty u oh Reply this thread

Smally | 5/8/2012 1:51:37 AMNa wa 4 both of u.DAVIDO u want 2 kill urself,hmm. Reply this thread

opeyemi | 5/10/2012 10:15:42 AMi gey feel u davido two much bragga my guy....... Reply this thread

gbolahan | 5/27/2012 7:58:17 AMpls guy don't kill ur self because dis girl na ur senior sister Reply this thread

Bucky | 6/2/2012 3:28:41 PMLeave dem alone,ur own worst pass dem. If God says yes nobody can say no Reply this thread

Chidonwa | 6/6/2012 7:23:12 AMNawa 4 una o! Una wan carry mouth kill eniola nd davido?abeg make una takm easy o! Cos as i dnt see d guy with the bottle of alchoholic drink 4 hand.u no say na d drink dey do dat luv no be guy o!so make una no put blame 4 d guy, una blame d girl cos she take d merit of lv 4rm d guy unda d influence of alchohol! Reply this thread

June | 6/12/2012 12:25:57 AMDC,I think you should do a criuqite of the Pearce Piece that Abdreas kindly linked us to I just posted this at NewScientist: Fred,This piece, (like your gross misrepresentation of Mojib Latif's speech at the third World Climate Conference in 2009), is riddled with errors. Not to mention clearly being sympathetic towards the skeptics and being uncritical of the nefarious actions of the people like Mosher, McIntyre and Curry. These people want the best of both worlds, they attack, slander and defame climate scientists and then at the same time expect to be treated with respect and claim to want to reconcile . This is nothing but PR campaign by the skeptics Fred, and I'm sad to see that it seems you have bought it hook-line and sinker.Some points, there were probably not 28 climate scientists at the conference. Do you consider Goddard a climate scientist? McIntyre is not a statistician by training. You misrepresented Dr. Gavin Schmidt's position on attending the conference (go to Eli Rabett's place for clarification) it seems that you did not solicit his opinion before writing this. The workshop was also financed by the Gulbenkian Foundation do some research on them Fred, they have ties to big oil.The scientific literature has shown again and again that the observed warming can not be explained by ENSO or PDO or other internal climate modes, because they simply move heat around in the system. Trenberth et al. (2002, JGR) showed that +0.06 C of the +0.4 C warming (about 15%) observed between 1950 and 1998 was attributable to trends in ENSO.These internal climate modes are internal drivers which can act to mute or enhance the underlying warming trend from higher CO2, they cannot and do not explain the fact that the planet is in a net positive energy imbalance (Murphy et al. 2009). How can the climate scientists you and the skeptics are chastising be indifferent to these internal climate modes and oscillations when they have published papers specifically to investigate their role? Please think about this the skeptics love to make unsubstantiated and unsupported claims, because they know they cannot back them up. What does count in this game of skeptics is rhetoric, innuendo and opinions, not facts.This is yet another astounding example of the media failing us. To say I am disappointed by your partisan and uncritical and error riddled piece would be a gross understatement.I would complain to your editors, but previous experience has shown me that NewScientist has no interest in acknowledging or retracting errors on the climate file, especially it seems when those errors are made by you.For what it is worth I urge you to please correct the errors pointed out to you here and to revise or retract your piece. Thank you. Reply this thread

Vickie blue | 6/22/2012 7:16:23 AMPls guys is eny not a woman? Let them be she have what other women have she can give for davido she can cook for him let them be thank u every one Reply this thread

Auth | 8/20/2012 10:47:44 PMThere is, finally, a pbuilshed rebuttal to the extraordinary paper by Gerlich and Tsheuschner in IJMP(B). And at the same time, there is a reply by G&T to the rebuttal.This is scraping the bottom of the barrel of arguments against AGW. There is good discussion at the Rabbet Run; I am collecting all the blog links I can find at Duae Quartunciae; Stoat puts in his oar; and there is a new Climate Physics Forums bulletin board with a thread for discussion of the rebuttal and reply. I'm plugging here unashamedly. I am the admin of the bulletin board, and also one of the authors of the rebuttal, and I blog at Duae Quartunciae.Giving all the relevant links is overload. Click on my name for the bulletin board. Search for the blog posts; there will be more of them coming up, I guess. And here is the journal link:The abstracts for the rebuttal and reply can be found online at the pages for . The rebuttal and reply are:Comment On Falsification Of The Atmospheric Co2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics , by Joshua B. Halpern, Christopher M. Colose, Chris Ho-Stuart, Joel D. Shore, Arthur P. Smith and Jf6rg Zimmermann.Reply To Comment On Falsification Of The Atmospheric Co2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics', by Joshua B. Halpern, Christopher M. Colose, Chris Ho-Stuart, Joel D. Shore, Arthur P. Smith, Jf6rg Zimmermann , by Gerhard Gerlich and Ralf D. Tscheuschner[DC: It is indeed unfortunate that you and your co-authors had to spend time on this, but it is very important to respond to papers that are so obviously flawed. Let me add my congratulations and heartfelt thanks to you and the rest of the writing team. ] Reply this thread

No tym | 10/26/2012 1:45:22 PMMy guy davido don't mind wat ever they say.......... Even at all if u guyz wan't to correct the super star u won't abuse him ok.............. Davido we need more swags from u...... Reply this thread

Queen | 12/21/2012 4:50:58 AMNa wa for you eniola...u wan kill davido for us abi? U way cari weight pass alive cow,and u self davido u no day shame self. Reply this thread

ENISEXY. | 4/14/2013 2:52:19 AMIF U WANT TO HEAR MY COMMENT CALL ME.07063828132. Reply this thread

gbege | 4/29/2013 3:27:50 AMLolo u re right. They kissed Reply this thread